Institutional Management Subcommittee refines details in matrix of questions of the self-assessment process

subc management1

In addition, information was reviewed that allowed us to complement the work that was presented in the plenary session on June 19.

Like every week and in a process already internalized, the members of the Institutional Management Subcommittee met to work collaboratively on the analysis of the matrix of questions for key informants and, thus, add it to the report already delivered in the first plenary session. .subc getsion2

During the meeting, which maintains constant participation, the members were able to subdivide ideas and write questions and statements regarding the matrix that must be presented and the objective lines it contains, along with the purposes of the University.

The Vice Chancellor of Economic and Administrative Affairs, Dr. Armando Mansilla Sunkel, leader of the Institutional Management Subcommittee, presented the matrix and interacted with all the members of the subgroups organized by topics, who did hard work when writing the questions to be presented at the next plenary meeting, which will bring together all those who have worked on the institutional self-assessment process.

For the person in charge of the Office of Institutional Studies, belonging to the Directorate of Strategic Development and Quality, Mg. Melissa Meriño, “this process has been fundamental for the institution and for all of us who work in it, since we are not only contributing from our point of view, but we have had to reinforce our knowledge and transfer it to other people, know what they make and understand the dynamics of other units; In this way, we contribute directly to the self-evaluation process, and therefore, to the future accreditation with which the University will be faced.”

During the last week of July, the second plenary session will be held, and at that time is when the participants of each subcommittee will have the opportunity to learn about the progress in the process, as well as interact with their peers to raise doubts and assertions.

Written by Patricia Castro, DirCom