The methodology used to set fees is restricted to teaching and does not consider the costs of research, extension and innovation activities, inherent and intertwined with the work of the schools that make up the CRUCH. The Council of Rectors suggests that this model can contribute irremediably to inequality and that a significant number of institutions can be left in a situation of fragility and vulnerability. “The perspectives are quite complex,” said the executive vice president of CRUCH and rector of the University of Santiago, Juan Manuel Zolezzi at the end of the plenary session of the Council this Thursday, July 30. He explained that “in this first stage, fees will be set for careers in the areas of Personal Services, Pedagogy and Law.

Other racing groups will come later. The way we are proceeding, which is in the law, is based on direct costs and some indirect costs. For universities that are not just teachers, such as the CRUCH universities, which have research, innovation, extension and links with the media activities, the only thing that solves, in theory, is the issue of teaching. Who finances the other functions?” The Council of Rectors states that the Undersecretary of Higher Education has established a model that does not have an adequate justification nor does it adjust to the Chilean Higher Education System. The Undersecretary has only considered a view of historical costs, which does not adjust to the new challenges demanded by the system, which will demand higher cost structures than those of previous years, such as the resources necessary for the innovation and quality of educational projects. oriented towards continuous improvement and excellence.

Furthermore, by not considering the dynamism of costs, the model will lack the ability to adequately predict the financing needs of the next five years. In what is proposed by the Ministry, there is no mechanism that allows projecting the evolutionary trajectory of training costs in a multi-year perspective. Additionally, the methodology implemented by the Undersecretary of Higher Education does not seem to adapt to the heterogeneity of the Chilean university system, which It is characterized by institutional diversity where the same degree can be taught by selective and highly complex universities and in merely teaching universities. In this context of great heterogeneity, where the same career is associated with substantive differences in the quality and nature of training, grouping teaching costs in the same statistical sample does not reflect these differences.

The incorporation of quality factors or those associated with the complexity of the university does not necessarily capture differences, which are not easily scalable with a weighter. Fee setting process In accordance with the provisions of Law 21.091, in the next stage of the fee setting process, the Undersecretariat of Higher Education must present to the Commission of Experts a report that contains the calculation of the fee values. , the basic registration fees and charges for the degree, as well as the corresponding calculation reports, on July 31, 2020. Subsequently, a period of one month is opened for higher education institutions to send their assessments to the Commission. Then, the Commission must rule on the Undersecretariat's report within three months of its receipt, being able to approve it or make substantiated observations, and must “keep in view” the assessments of the higher education institutions. Finally, the Undersecretariat, within a period of three months from receipt of said observations from the Committee of Experts, must make a reasoned ruling on them, approving or rejecting them, and must issue the corresponding exempt resolution(s). The Undersecretary of Higher Education will update in October of each year, by means of an exempt resolution, the values ​​established in the current resolutions, in accordance with the readjustment indicated by the Public Sector Budget Law for the respective year. Considering the previous stages of the tariff regulation process, the Council of Rectors considers the low participation that the institutions have had to be worrying.

The first proposal for technical bases made by the Undersecretariat had to consider a consultation process with the institutions assigned to the free program and their student federations, which materialized in a series of questions that did not incorporate the proposal for technical bases, so Universities were not aware of this model prior to its implementation. Additionally, in the first request for information, with which the model established in the technical bases was established and tested, a significant percentage of institutions did not participate, directly affecting the collection, processing and conclusions obtained. Furthermore, the rectors maintain that the implementation scheme of the new tariffs should consider a temporal gradualness, that is, a period of two or three years should be given so that the universities can generate the necessary adjustments that allow them to converge to the new ones. regulated values ​​for their careers.

The Council of Rectors suggests that this model can contribute irremediably to inequality and that a significant number of institutions can be left in a situation of fragility and vulnerability. “The country has never been available to set funds for research that are not competitive, that are basal. And we require these researchers so that they can do good classes. If that is not understood this way and it is understood that teaching is just the professor standing in the room delivering content, then this country is condemning all the good that universities do in terms of research, science, technology, innovation. Unless in the future, after a lot of knocking on doors, we can receive resources,” said Zolezzi. Roadmap for gender equality Later, the Undersecretary of Science, Carolina Torrealba, presented the Roadmap for Gender Equality that is being promoted by the Undersecretary of Science, Technology, Knowledge and Innovation, as well as the recent creation of the Council for Gender Equality in Science.

The group of ten experts - among whom are four researchers from CRUCH universities - will make recommendations for the Roadmap for a Gender Equality Policy in Science, Technology, Knowledge and Innovation, which seeks to promote measures that increase the access and allow the development of female researchers under equal conditions. "This is a deep problem, culturally deeply rooted, which is why this council is a starting point from which we need to convene many more people and institutions that allow us to contribute to building a diverse, broad and inclusive research system," said the Undersecretary Torrealba. After her intervention, the undersecretary answered questions from the rectors and lines of joint work were proposed in order to advance the approaches of this public policy. Source: CRUCH